Answer:
the point of science is to disprove hypothesis so having a hypothesis that doesn't allow that to happen is not good science
2. they don't fit in our mouths so are a trait from when we had larger jaws
3. bones of your lower jaw, middle ear and voice box (they aren't actually gills fyi, they just look like them)
4. likely yes as their bones were hollow but likely only able to fly short distances, the thought was that they couldn't do their size and weight but with hollow bones they were able to like a quail would
5. no because they could be sister taxa, you would have a hard time proving exactly that this new fossil is the common ancestor that birds came from to replace the old hypothesis (guess) of which one did.
Explanation:
Answer:
Excessive nutrients from fertilizer run off.
Explanation:
Scientists have suspected that phytoplankton blooms might be connected to agricultural run-off. They got some evidence from a recent study by comparing the timing of irrigation along the west coast of Mexico and phytoplankton blooms in Mexico’s Sea of Cortez. During the comparison, they had found a close correlation. Phytoplankton blooms occurred in the Sea of Cortez shortly after the irrigation. This happened because of carried fertilizers after irrigation and other agricultural run-offs into the sea.
The bloom detected in the Gulf of Mexico on December 13 might be similarly linked to agricultural run-off.
Distance/Time = 120 Km/2 hours =120/2 Km per hour or for short 60 Km per hour
Answer:
ok man im only gonna anser a few so here did ya a solid good luck
2- arctic
3-pacific
4- antarctic
5- indian
6- pacific
7- greek or norse
8- pangea
9- mariana trench
10-true
11- ???? 70 perecent of earth if that what its asking
12- ???
13- marine viruses (internet) i think probs phytoplankton
14- green i think
15-???
16- hella
17- israel
18- salt
19- a drifter
20- corilis effect
21- idk man
22- 1.6%
23- sonars
24- ??
25- bermuda triangle
Explanation: