ANSWER: no
EXPLAIN: because a proportional relationship graph would have a straight line running through the origin
<u>Answer:
</u>
The population of a city has decreased by 38% since it was last measured. If the current population is 27,900 .Previous population of city was 45000.
<u>
Solution:
</u>
Given that current population of city is 27900.
Also, population of a city has decreased by 38% since it was last measured.
Let assume that population of city when it was last measured = x
Decreased of 38% means x-38% of x . we can write this as,
So current population is
Equating above expression to the given value of current population, we get
x=45000
Hence previous population of city was 45000.
Answer:
ok wait which symbol? this (<)?
well it should stay the same since -100 is greater than the 11b-12
LHS=RHS
11b÷11b b must cancell b also do the same on -12. -12÷11 will give u a lesser value compared to -100
prove me wrong
4a-3
because 4(a-3) what’s in () can’t be done so you go to the next step in pemdas and multiply and then you write it out and your done
Answer:
for 15 crayons box she can spend
Step-by-step explanation:
The computation of the number of crayons for which she can spend is shown below:
Given that
She can spend $30
And, the cost is 2 per box
So, for the number of crayons for which she can spend is
= $30 ÷ 2
= 15 crayons box
Hence, for 15 crayons box she can spend
The same would be relevant