Compare the costs of using renewable resources to the costs of using nonrenewable resources.
2 answers:
Answer:
Sample response:
The costs of using both renewable and nonrenewable resources depend on the extent of the use. If renewable resources are managed wisely, the use of the resource will not exceed the rate at which it is replenished. In this instance the cost of using renewable resources can be minimized, if not entirely eliminated. The cost of using nonrenewable resources is harder to minimize because nonrenewable resources cannot be replenished at the rate at which they are used. The environmental impact of using nonrenewable resources such as fossil fuels is greater than just the loss of the resource itself. Other impacts such as acid rain, global warming, and atmospheric pollution can result from the use of nonrenewable resources.
Explanation:
2021 edge
have a nice day
You might be interested in
There are 1.93 x 10²⁴ particles
<h3>Further explanation</h3>Given
3.2 moles of Neon gas
Required
Number of particles
Solution
The mole is the number of particles(molecules, atoms, ions) contained in a substance
<em>1 mol = 6.02.10²³ particles </em>
Can be formulated
N=n x No
N = number of particles
n = mol
No = Avogadro's = 6.02.10²³
So the number of particles for 3.2 moles :
N = 3.2 x 6.02.10²³
N = 1.93 x 10²⁴
or
we can describe it using Avogadro's number conversion factor