The original expression evaluates to 54.4 as shown in the first working.
_____
For some reason, 3.4 got transcribed to be 1.7 in the 3rd line of the second working. There is no math operation in the expression that requires 3.4 to be divided by 2.
Answer:
3
Step-by-step explanation:
D. You can tell by the opened and closed line dots.
You need to divide the top number by the bottom number and you will get your answer
Answer:
75° quadrant I
120° quadrant II
–30° quadrant IV
–200° quadrant II
Step-by-step explanation:
just did it and these were the answers