<span>The predicted productivity equation is 2.0 + .5 * Experience + .2 * aptitude score . Then we can use the slope coefficients to figure this out. Jack gains .5 *.3 from his extra three months and Jill has gained from her extra 20 points on the aptitude test .2 * 20 = 4 . Then we have that 4 – 1.5 = 2.5 thus Jill is predicted to be more productive than Jack. Thus the answer is b.</span>
Unsafe because you dont interlock them or sercure them therefore it could fall over hurt you or someone else standing by
<u>Answer</u>:
<u>No</u>
Explanation:
Remember, that as used in statistics the Confidence intervals <em>only</em> ascertain the extent to which a sample is uncertainty or certainty, that is, the student report of a 90% confidence interval is just a probability the university population of men and women surveyed would fall under this range of value (minus 150,30).
Therefore, it cannot be concluded that mu(women) is higher than mu(men.
Answer:
c. ethical climate.
Explanation:
<em>Ethical Climate is the moral atmosphere that domains and is practiced by a company in a work environment. </em>
I hope you find this information useful and interesting! Good luck!
