An explanation of how a value judgment would have no objective truth because there is a difference in opinion/perspective.
<h3>What is an Objective Truth?</h3>
This refers to the truth that is spoken without the <em>use of bias</em> that is accurate.
Hence, we can see that a value judgment is the assessment of a thing as being good or bad based on the standards and priority of a person.
A factual statement on the other hand is either true or false and would remain the same, irrespective of perspectives or opinions.
Read more about objective truths here:
brainly.com/question/17133736
#SPJ1
Answer:
Depends if the news is true
Explanation:
Because you saying it fake news anything that is against you is being bais because of it your opinion if the news is true.
Answer:
Accept that you may never agree
Explanation:
Sometimes people don't agree on so they try to settle things with a debate but even then they might not agree in the end. you have to agree to disagree. Accepeting that you won't agree will make things easier so neither of them has the possibility of getting mad.
Answer:
d. Paul is protective of Mitchell.
Explanation:
got it right on edge :)
