Relevance is ordinarily a necessary condition, but not a sufficient condition, for the admissibility of evidence. For example, relevant evidence may be excluded if its tendency to prove or disprove a fact is heavily outweighed by the possibility that the evidence will prejudice or confuse the jury.
Answer:
Yes lol
Explanation:
He has 264 Electoral votes and only needs 6 more while Donald Trump needs 56.
It’s like acting without thinking or acting in a horrible
Incomplete question. Assumed you are referring to story themes examples that talk about death.
<u>Explanation:</u>
There are many such examples, consider a few of them:
- <em>The land where no man wants to feely go.</em>
- <em>Death!!! The last enemy.</em>
- <em>The last destination.</em>
Answer:
Kayla closed the kitchen window because she was cold.
Explanation:
