Answer:
First question is b, second is d, third is d, fourth is c, the last and fifth is b
Explanation:
it just suits it.
Answer:
This question is debateable but I would say yes
Explanation:
He says that he took the road less taken and it has made all the difference so this could be interpreted as him being satisfied with his decision.
His self-assurance is revealed, he is confident and believes in his abilities.
There is a conflict between rumor and reality in this excerpt.
On one hand, we have the rumor - that Nick became engaged to someone, and everybody heard it was true. However, on the other hand, we have the reality - that he in fact is not engaged, thus the whole story is just a gossip rather than something that actually happened.
<h2>
Answer:</h2>
How could the headline best be revised to make it objective?
✔ Valido’s Conduct under Review
How could the first sentence of the article be revised to improve objectivity?
✔ by removing "unpopular" and "conservative"
How could the reporter balance Senator Saud’s comments to make the article more objective?
✔ by adding a comment from a Republican senator
(Photo for proof at the bottom.)
<h2>
Explanation:</h2>
Objective means non-biased, or free of opinions. Replacing the original headline with "Valido’s Conduct under Review" could be more objective because it does not have bribery in the name. Bribery has a negative connotation and putting it in a title is possibly attacking a person. That is my best guess for this answer, I think the original title is already objective.
Removing "unpopular" and "conservative" improves objectivity because unpopular is an opinionated word that can be used to attack someone. Conservative seems to have a negative connotation in this case, so it could be biased. Reporting information from both sides also improves objectivity, as it shows you're not leaning towards one side.
Here's a photo of Edge just incase.