The best answer is "B", as direct characterization is characteristics revealed obviously, like "Her Dark Red Hair".
Answer: sub, not sub, sub or (2,1,2)
Explanation:
got it right on edge 2020
Answer and Explanation:
According to the reading of the lines presented, we can infer that the Abuelita was locked for the second time in the warehouse by its own will. That's because she wanted to test the power of the whistle, watching not only if her granddaughter could hear how she was able to whistle back. This strategy of being trapped by Abuelita left her with a feeling of being a very intelligent and shrewd lady.
We can confirm this when the granddaughter says "I could see that she was smiling, and I think I even heard her chuckling."
The question that should be asked when characterizing the antagonist is "How do others respond to the antagonist?" Option A is correct.
An antagonist is the character in a story who is against the protagonist.
The antagonist is opposed to, struggles against, or competes with another; opponent; adversary, in literature, it is the adversary of the hero or protagonist of a drama or other literary work.
The English word antagonist stems from the Greek antagonistēs.
You would need to check how to write the comnparative analysis. In the "lens" (or "keyhole") comparison, in which you weight A less heavily than B, you use A as a lens through which to view B. Just as looking through a pair of glasses changes the way you see an object, using A as a framework for understanding B changes the way you see B. Lens comparisons are useful for illuminating, critiquing, or challenging the stability of a thing that, before the analysis, seemed perfectly understood. Often, lens comparisons take time into account: earlier texts, events, or historical figures may illuminate later ones, and vice versa. Faced with a daunting list of seemingly unrelated similarities and differences, you may feel confused about how to construct a paper that isn't just a mechanical exercise in which you first state all the features that A and B have in common, and then state all the ways in which A and B are different. Predictably, the thesis of such a paper is usually an assertion that A and B are very similar yet not so similar after all. To write a good compare-and-contrast paper, you must take your raw data—the similarities and differences you've observed—and make them cohere into a meaningful argument. You may also contact the professionals from Prime Writings and let them do it for you. I am sure you will like the overall experience.