Plz don’t report me I’m just trying to do my homework like y’all
Answer:
9.1%
Explanation:
With regards to the above, margin is computed as;
Margin = (Net operating income ÷ Sales) × 100
Given that:
Net operating income = $2,597,140
Sales = $28,540,000
Margin = ($2,597,140 ÷ $28,540,000) × 100
Margin = 9.1%
The statement, "During most of the Soviet rule (and certainly after 1934), any form of experimental art was considered dissident and, therefore, could only exist as a part of underground culture" is True
Option a
<u>Explanation:
</u>
All across the 1920s, the creation of Soviet Art was followed by an era of severe ideological competitiveness among artistic groups, which each tried to ensure that their views were given a priority for the determination of the shapes and instructions under which soviet art will also grow.
The increasing crisis of radical left wing artwork done this fight even more angry, In the late 1930's, several avant-garde movements that emerged in the 1910s had become tired and began depicting artifacts in real life, as they sought to return to the traditional model of drawn pictures.
Answer:
A balloon mortgage is a type of a loan that requires the borrower to make the payment as a lump-sum at the maturity period while under the ARM the borrower is allowed to choose the small periodic payments suitable for both the lender and the borrower.
ARM is the abbreviation for Adjustable Rate Mortgage. therefore the loan repayment changes according to agreement between the lender and the borrower.
Answer:
Explanation:
Yes, Disparate Impact Theory can be used in this case relating to the processes of subjective selection such as interrogations. If a discriminatory workplace practice has an unfair and aggressive impact on minorities, it may be in violation of Title VII. Professional individual employees who support on the basis of discretionary judgments without intending to do so are engaging in biased conduct.
The case of Watson V. Fort Worth Bank & Trust will be used to support my claim. Clara Watson turned down a promotion that was contingent on an interview under this scenario.
The U.s. Supreme Court Declared that a Title VII claim to a strategy of subjection enforcement can only be investigated under the unequal care principle. In the majority decision, the Court allowed the principle of (disparate effects) to apply to arbitrarily defined work practices.
