Answer:
C) aspirational reference group
Explanation:
An aspirational reference group can be described as a group of individuals with whom a person (or many millions in this case) wish to be associated with. This person will try to imitate their behavior, and most importantly their purchase behavior since he/she doesn't belong to that group but wishes he/she could.
Answer:
The amount of underapplied manufacturing overhead at the end of the year is $1200.
Explanation:
Total estimated $360,000/est
direct labour hours 45000 = $8x (Actual Dl hours) 47000
= $376,000
Actual Overhead worked = $377,200 - $376,000
= $1200 underapplied
Therefore, The amount of underapplied manufacturing overhead at the end of the year is $1200.
The answer to this question is Lower
Viscosity refers to the rate of thickness on a certain substance compared to another. Unlike magma, Lava is the mixture of various liquid, crystals, and some elements such as silicon<span>, oxygen, aluminum, calcium, iron, magnesium </span>sodium<span>, potassium, phosphorus, and titanium, which makes it significantly more thicker compared to magma.</span>
Answer:
a.) Nukere should be held liable because of the dangerous nature of hazardous waste. Regardless of safety checks, the accident happened.
Explanation:
"Nuclear power plants" are known to be<em> the most reliable source of electricity</em> there is in the world. However, they pose some<em> risks</em> especially when it comes to the possibility of a nuclear accident happening.
When it comes to "nuclear third party liability," a strict liability of the nuclear operator means that the victim has no fault in any situation that might occur. This means that <em>the operator is responsible or liable</em> of the power plant's dangerous nature of hazardous wastes.
Whether or not they have recently passed safety checks, there is no need for them to prove anything on he is at fault. So, <u>this makes Nukere liable for the situation.</u>
This explains the answer.
Answer:
Positive Statements: 1st & 2nd ; Normative Statements: 3rd & 4th
Explanation:
Positive Economics is <u>objective</u> & <u>facts</u> based <u>actual</u> economic issue description , explaining verifiable phenomenas (causal relationships).
Normative Economics is <u>subjective</u> & opinion based conclusive <u>solutions</u> to economic issues, including '<u>ought to be</u>' unverifiable suggestions.
1. Lung cancer kills millions of people each year: reflects actual objective verifiable fact about an economic (health) issue.
2. Too many people smoke: denotes another actual objective variable fact connected to (potential cause of) the above economic (health) issue.
So , these two are Positive Statements.
3. If the government were to increase taxes on cigarettes, fewer people would smoke : Is subjective opinion based probable solution to the above economic (health) issue.
4. The government should increase taxes on cigarettes : Is an 'ought to' suggestion for an economic participant (govt) to solve the above economic (health) issue.
So , these two are Normative Statements