Answer:
The productivity of an average person in the top twenty percent is four (4) times that of an average person in the bottom eighty percent.
Explanation:
In questions 3c and 4b, the values of the gross domestic products for the top twenty (20) percent and the bottom eighty (80) percent are $22,800 and $5,700 respectively. Therefore, if we take the ratio of the two values, we have:
$22800/$5700 = 4
The productivity of an average person in the top twenty percent is four (4) times that of an average person in the bottom eighty percent.
Answer:
The correct answer is letter "C": will remain the same.
Explanation:
A partnership is an organization with two or more members running a business. They share the profits in percentage terms in proportion to their partnership value. The partnership dissolves and a new partnership is created when one of the partners is removed, retired or deceased or even when a new partner is introduced. The remaining partners' capital will be the same, for accounting purposes.
Answer:
21.45%
Explanation:
Remaining amount to have $1,000,000 = $1,000,000 - $50,000 = $950,000
Using the interest rate function RATE(nper,pmt,pv,fv) in the excel, we obtain an interest rate of 21.45%
Where,
nper = number of period = 30
pmt = annual payment
pv = present value which has a default value of 0.
fv = future value = $950,000
Note: Find attached the excel sheet to see result.
Answer: charge a monopoly price
Explanation:
Patents provide an exclusive right to the firm in the production and sale of a drug. This provides the firm exclusive market power to decide the price and the quantity and therefore the firm is able to charge a monopoly price and also earn monopoly profits.
When an existing patent expires and the generic producers enter the market, the price reduces due to an increase in the supply of the erstwhile patented drug. This will reduce the monopoly profit of incumbent producers. Therefore, they will seek to deter the entry of generic drug makers in order to safeguard their monopoly profits and price.
Therefore, incumbents were willing to give enough to potential entrants so as to make them delay entry to charge a monopoly price.
The effect of the 2013 Supreme Court decision allowing legal action against these companies is increase in the cost of pay-for-delay agreements and also reduce incumbent profits from these agreements.
The both work in the Energy Generation career pathway.
