Answer:
C. that there may be more than one way to interpret data
Explanation:
When determining if an explanation is correct you must always remember that there may be more than one way to interpret data. Depending on the context that the explanation is being used in or who is reading it, the explanation may be interpreted in two completely different manners which may be far off from the original intended explanation. This can therefore completely nullify or maybe even expand the original determination.
The is should be C, Im not 100% sure though...
<span>The experimental evidence that leads </span><span>scientists to believe that only quantized electronic energy states exist in atoms </span>was the Niels Bohr experiment on Hydrogen gas. The quantized model for electron orbits in atoms that effectively explained the spectroscopic behavior of the atoms. Each line in the spectrum corresponds to one exact frequency of light emitted by the atom.
Appalachian: A. Two continents colliding.
The Appalachian mountain range is an ancient example of a collision between two continental plates. Both plates have low density and little subduction occurs between them.
North American Cordillera: B. Terrane accretion
These form when two continents that collided bonded so tight that it forms a permanent land mass. If the continents would pull away from each other, the terrane stays intact.
Aleutian plate: D. Oceanic convergence
This is a type of convergence where one plate subducts beneath another plate. Between the two, the older plate is usually the one that subducts because it is usually more dense.
Andes mountain range: C. An oceanic plate and continental plate colliding.
In the collision between an oceanic and continental plate, the thinner and more dense oceanic plate subducts under the continental plate. The Andes mountain range was formed by the subduction of the Nazca Plate beneath the South american Plate.