One major reason for exploring extreme environments is to find new resources. An example of a resource is the search for a new antibiotic. Extreme environments have rare species endemic to the regions which can offer different insights from the normative environment we are used to.
No, I would not. This is because the risk of death is higher in an extreme environment. Example of these risks are deadly diseases or harsh climate. The body may be unable to adjust to the extreme environment hence may be unable to restore homoeostasis; such as in restoring body heat in extremely cold environments hence leading to hypothermia.
Answer:
Might save some lives and also vaccine could reduce a chance of future outbreaks. Only if the patient is aware of the risk that might happen and agreed to use the drug.
A human has a total of 46 chromosomes (23 from daddy and 23 from mommy). :)
A sperm cell has 23 chromosomes and an egg cell that has 23 chromosomes. 23 + 23 equals 46. Sometimes (due to mutations), a person
may have less chromosomes than they need. This may cause some problems like Turner syndrome(treatment can help aid the situation but, it can't be cured).
Hope this helps you :)
For the answer to the question above,
the ecosystem's approach to conservation differs from a single-species approach by involving restoration and by protecting the whole habitat and organisms and species in it.
So the answer is
<span>"an ecosystem approach involves restoring and protecting an entire habitat and all the species within it".</span>
Sorry I don’t know but good luck