Answer:
option 2) smaller
As CE is the amount which if the agent gets with certainty, then agent will be indifferent between playing lottery or getting that amount with certainty
So L2 is more risky, & agent is risk averse, so agent will be ready to accept a lower amount with certainty ( as compared to the amount for a safer option : L1)
So CE of L2 will be lower
Answer:
A. True
Explanation:
It can hop on the trend to seem appealing. Ex: in the early 2000s, crop tops where a trend, so businesses where all making shirts that are crop tops so people would buy them.
The statement is true. A project manager may "also" be the project champion. But it is not mandatory. But there are possibilities that the project manager is also an expert the in project he is handling. Thus, the above statement is true. If the statement would have been - The project manager will be or needs to be the project champion, then it would be false statement.
<span>The correct answer is that it depends on the specifics of the incentive plan. A general incentive plan that is not linked directly to productivity will typically become old news to staff within a few years. What was once an incentive will become familiar and may be viewed as an entitlement as staff start looking for the eternal "what's next?".
An incentive directly linked to some kind of productivity (e.g. hours worked) will have a far longer shelf life (though this will, of course, vary by employee). In this scenario the ongoing incentive remains year over year (e.g. the hours of overtime worked in the previous year will have no bearing on the current year so if you want a similar result you will need to maintain your effort whereas if you want a better result you will have to increase your effort).
All incentive plans, however, are subject to the rules of diminishing marginal utility to the employees and will diminish over time as the employee either becomes comfortable at a certain productivity level or becomes disenchanted by other factors.
In summation: an incentive plan, if designed properly, can work for a relatively long period of years though results may vary by employee as everyone is motivated by different things (though providing an alternative incentive to money may somewhat mitigate this additional potential problem).</span>
<h2>Sebastian is employing <u>Goal setting</u> as a mechanism of career management.</h2>
Explanation:
<u>Goal setting:</u>
- Serve as a base for "Human resource Planning"
- It is proven that those employees who have goal setting will show good performance on their job.
- This will directly or indirectly promote the organization
- We can achieve organizational goals too
- Goal setting techniques are used by successful people around the world
- This might even be a favorite interview questions because the HR can understand how effective the employee would be for the organization.
