The genetic characteristic of two different organisms are induced into a new host organism for the purpose of producing new genes.
<u>Explanation:</u>
In the field of bio technology, Recombinant DNA technology plays a very important role. This helps in the production of genes. The first thing insulin of human was produced with this technology. In this technology, the gene that is to be produced is cut and it is placed inside a host organism where it gets multiplied.
This technology uses five steps in gene production. Firstly, the DNA that is essential will be cut. this is done by restriction site. PCR is used secondly in order to amplify the copies of the genes. Then these are induced into Vectors after which they will again be introduced into a host organism. Then finally the results will be the genes of the desired characteristics.
You should use a Punnett Square for this question
The Punnett square predicts the offspring of two parents (two alleles). In this case you have brown eyes (Bb) and blue eyes (bb)
In the four boxes you should have Bb, Bb, bb and bb (50% chance of offspring with blue eyes and 50% chance of offspring with brown eyes).
The genotypes ratio will be 2Bb:2bb
And the phenotypic ratio will be 2 Brown : 2 Blue
Answer
I added 4 and 5 as an attachment due to time constraint.
Explanation:
1. at a steady state ca2+ taken by vesicle = 40n/mol
enclosed volume of CSR = 5μ/mg
concentration of ca2+ in vesicle =
40*10⁻⁶/5x10⁻⁶
= 0.008
= 8x10⁻⁹mol/L
2. radius of circle =75nM
volume = 150nm
volume of vesicle = 4/3 x pi x r³
= 1.33 x 3.14 x (75x10⁻⁹)³
= 1.77 x 10⁻²¹
when we convert this we get
1.77x10⁻¹⁸L since 1m³ is equal to 100oL
surface area =4x3.14x(75x10⁻⁹)²
= 12.56x5.625⁻¹⁵
= 7.065x10⁻¹⁴m²
this is 7.065x10⁻¹⁰cm²
3. number of vesicle/CSR
= 5x10⁻⁶/1.77x10⁻¹⁸
= 2.824x10¹²
surface are = 2.824x10¹² x7.06x10⁻¹⁰
= 19.95x10²
<span>True. A valid hypothesis must be testable and able to be verified or disputed empirically, because otherwise it is not a scientific hypothesis. A hypothesis that is not readily testable (for example, about a made up or fictional event) are not good hypotheses.</span>