Bonds will be the least risky since there is no risk involved at all. Bonds give out guaranteed payments and A rated bonds will be even more secure.
The next would be property. Since property is a physical asset, the risk involved is relatively lower than stocks.
The next would be retirement plans which would typically have bonds and stocks.
The most risky would be speculative stocks.
The order from least risky to most risky would be:
1. A rated bonds
2. Property
3. Retirement plans
4. Speculative stocks
Answer:
Firstly i will discuss General electric philosophy. So, what happens is sometimes when you don't put pressure on managers then they become lethargic and slow. For this matter they needs reminder to stay on tip of their game. But at the same time its demotivating too.
Secondly, in Valero energy they believe in psychological safety, to make their employees feel secure and safe. It has great impact on employee performance.
Actually, company's performance is not measured by profit and loss alone. It also measures by other factors like employee safety, employee motivation, impact of policies on employees and bringing positive addition to the life of employee.
General electric is high performing company in terms of profit and revenue. They follow negative reinforcement philosophy.
Both concepts eargs the employees to perform better. But one approach is better i.e to make them feel secure and make them believe that company cares for their career, future and well being. That actually motivates the employee. In return employees works wonders for that company.
In latest HR practices, many professionals are shifting from General electric philosophy to Valero energy philosophy. Because it increases productivity of employee by positive reinforcement. Which actually is better.
Answer and Explanation:
In the given case, the second will would be destroyed non-intentionally by the testatrix that represent the person who writes the will. Also the second will would have be intended to revoke the first will
In addition to this, Testatrix intends the second will to be value also at the same time she dont want the first will to be probated
So the second will would be upheld because of testamentary motive.
Answer: $2,398.55
Explanation:
The deposit at the end of year one would have been compounded by 2 years at the end of year 3. The second year deposit would have compounded by 1 year and the third year deposit would not have compounded at all.
The future value at the end of 3 years is;
= (500 * ( 1 + 11%)²) + (750 * ( 1 + 11%)) + 950
= $2,398.55
<em>The question might not be the exact same but you can use this as a reference. </em>