Answer:
An excise subsidy has only a substitution effect since the subsidy artificially lowers the price of the subsidized good causing the consumer to increase consumption of the good, but no income effect.
Explanation:
The above is true due to the fact that the consumption of goods increases. This could have been reduced had it been that, there was never any excise subsidy on those goods.
Answer:
26,833 units
Explanation:
Optimal production quantity is the quantity at which business incur minimum cost. This is the level of production per batch where the incur the lowest cost.
EOQ =
C = Carrying cost = 10 / 100 = $0.1 per unit
S = Setup cost = $100
D =Annual Demand = 360,000
EOQ =
EOQ =
EOQ = 26,833 units
Answer:
$3144.20
Explanation:
Using the formula of Future Value FV = PV(1 + R)^N
where;
Present Value PV = $1633
Rate R = 0.14
∴
FV = $1633(1 + 0.14)^5
FV = $1633(1.14)^5
FV = $3144.20
Answer:
<u>is not</u> , <u>consume more of hamburgers</u>
Explanation:
A consumer is said to have achieved equilibrium when within his budget constraint, he purchases that combination of two goods which yield maximum satisfaction to him.
The equation for consumer equilibrium for two products is given by
In the given case, = = = 6.666
= = 8
wherein, x= pizza
y= hamburger
As is evident, the marginal utility per dollar spent is greater in case of a hamburger, the consumer is not in a state of equilibrium.
Thus, he should consume more units of Hamburgers in order to maximize his utility.
Answer: The deficit is lower when compared to 2010.
Explanation:
The United States Budget for 2010 titled "A New Era of Responsibility: Renewing America's Promise by President Barack Obama's budget in 2010 was $3.456 trillion for expenditure and total revenue was $2.163 which led to a budget deficit of $1.294 trillion.
In 2019, the revenue was $3.422 and expenditure was $4.407 which led to a budget deficit was $985. It can be deduced that there has been a reduction in the budget deficit when compared to 2010.