Answer:
The answer is a(n)=12+(n-1)11; 166 millimeter
Use a calculator to find the cube root of positive or negative numbers. Given a number x<span>, the cube root of </span>x<span> is a number </span>a<span> such that </span><span>a3 = x</span><span>. If </span>x<span> positive </span>a<span> will be positive, if </span>x<span> is negative </span>a<span> will be negative. Cube roots is a specialized form of our common </span>radicals calculator<span>.
</span>Example Cube Roots:<span>The 3rd root of 64, or 64 radical 3, or the cube root of 64 is written as \( \sqrt[3]{64} = 4 \).The 3rd root of -64, or -64 radical 3, or the cube root of -64 is written as \( \sqrt[3]{-64} = -4 \).The cube root of 8 is written as \( \sqrt[3]{8} = 2 \).The cube root of 10 is written as \( \sqrt[3]{10} = 2.154435 \).</span>
The cube root of x is the same as x raised to the 1/3 power. Written as \( \sqrt[3]{x} = x^{\frac{1}{3}} \). The common definition of the cube root of a negative number is that <span>
(-x)1/3</span> = <span>-(x1/3)</span>.[1] For example:
<span>The cube root of -27 is written as \( \sqrt[3]{-27} = -3 \).The cube root of -8 is written as \( \sqrt[3]{-8} = -2 \).The cube root of -64 is written as \( \sqrt[3]{-64} = -4 \).</span><span>
</span>This was not copied from a website or someone else. This was from my last year report.
<span>
f -64, or -64 radical 3, or the cube root of -64 is written as \( \sqrt[3]{-64} = -4 \).The cube root of 8 is written as \( \sqrt[3]{8} = 2 \).The cube root of 10 is written as \( \sqrt[3]{10} = 2.154435 \).</span>
The cube root of x is the same as x raised to the 1/3 power. Written as \( \sqrt[3]{x} = x^{\frac{1}{3}} \). The common definition of the cube root of a negative number is that <span>
(-x)1/3</span> = <span>-(x1/3)</span>.[1] For example:
<span>The cube root of -27 is written as \( \sqrt[3]{-27} = -3 \).The cube root of -8 is written as \( \sqrt[3]{-8} = -2 \).The cube root of -64 is written as \( \sqrt[3]{-64} = -4 \).</span>
Let x be Mark's dollars... x + 5 = Austin's dollars....Brainliest?....
Answer:
The system is inconsistent.
Step-by-step explanation:
The system is
The associated matrix to the system is
Now we use row operations to find the echelon form of the matrix:
1. We substract to row 2, two times the row 1.
We substract to row 3, three times the row 1.
We substract to row 4, four times the row 1 and obtain the matrix
2. We multiply the second row of the preview step by -1/4. We obtain the matrix
3.
We add to row 3, eight times the row 2.
We add to row 4, fourtheen times the row 2 and obtain the matrix
4. We add to row 4 of the preview step, five times the row 3 and obtain the matrix
Using backward substitution we have that
, then and this is absurd. Then The system is inconsistent.