81473478 is the correct answer
hope this helped
First, let's add 30 to both sides:
4x - 30 +30 ≥ -3x + 12+30
4x ≥ -3x + 42
Now, let's add 3x to both sides
4x +3x ≥ -3x+3x + 42
7x ≥ 42
Let's divide both by 7:
x ≥ 6
<h3>
Answer: Choice B</h3>
No, this is not a plausible value for the population mean, because 5 is not within the 95% confidence interval.
====================================================
Explanation:
The greek letter mu is the population mean. It has the symbol which looks like the letter 'u' but with a tail at the front or left side.
The question is asking if mu = 5 is plausible if the researcher found the 95% confidence interval to be 5.2 < mu < 7.8
We see that 5 is <u>not</u> in that interval. It's a bit to the left of 5.2
Since mu = 5 is not in the interval, it's not a plausible value for the population mean.
Have we ruled it out with 100% confidence? No. Such a thing is not possible. There's always room for (slight) error. The researcher would need to do a census to be fully confident; however, such practices are very time consuming and expensive. This is the main reason why statistics is important to try to estimate the population with a sample.
Answer:
x
=
±
√
5
−
2
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer: 24
Step-by-step explanation: Multiply 4 by 6 to get 24