The socioeconomic view of corporate social accountability is that commercial enterprise have to center of attention on making precious contributions to society, now not just making profits.
<h3>What is the financial model of social responsibility?</h3>
The socio-economic model of social duty demonstrates that a enterprise not only focus or listen upon what form of income it is making or how will it make extra income in the future but additionally seem to be after the effect that it is inflicting on society from time to time.
<h3>Why is company social accountability necessary to business?</h3>
Embracing CSR will increase client retention and loyalty, increases employee engagement, improves manufacturer imaging, attracts funding opportunities and pinnacle talent, and makes a difference for bottom-line financials.
Learn more about corporate social responsibilities here:
<h3>
brainly.com/question/1373962</h3><h3 /><h3>#SPJ4</h3>
Answer:
Total materials variance = (Actual quantity * Actual price) - (Standard quantity * Standard price)
= 2,850 - (230 * 14.4)
= 462 (Favourable)
Materials price variance = (Standard price - Actual price) * Actual quantity
= [1.8 - (2,850/1,500)] * 1,500
= 150 Unfavourable
Materials quantity variance = (Standard quantity - Actual quantity) * Standard price
= [(230 * 8) - 1,500] * 1.8
= 612 Favourable
Total labour variance = (Actual hours * Actual rate) - (Standard hours * Standard rate)
= 19,458 - (230 * 84)
= 138 Unfavourable
Labour price variance = (Standard rate - Actual rate) * Actual hours
= [14 - (19,458/1,410)] * 1,410
= 282 Favourable
Labour quantity variance = (Standard hours - Actual hours) * Standard rate
= [(230 * 6) - 1,410] * 14
= 420 Unfavourable
The captains of industry like J.P. Morgan<span> respond to signs that the stock market was about to </span><span>collapse by meeting each other and trying to save the market. J.P. Morgan invited the leading bankers and financial experts to his home where they set up a shop in his library. They labored to channel money from strong institutions to weaker institutions to keep them afloat. Their efforts improved the condition of the economy over several weeks.</span>
Answer:
Explanation:
Yes, Disparate Impact Theory can be used in this case relating to the processes of subjective selection such as interrogations. If a discriminatory workplace practice has an unfair and aggressive impact on minorities, it may be in violation of Title VII. Professional individual employees who support on the basis of discretionary judgments without intending to do so are engaging in biased conduct.
The case of Watson V. Fort Worth Bank & Trust will be used to support my claim. Clara Watson turned down a promotion that was contingent on an interview under this scenario.
The U.s. Supreme Court Declared that a Title VII claim to a strategy of subjection enforcement can only be investigated under the unequal care principle. In the majority decision, the Court allowed the principle of (disparate effects) to apply to arbitrarily defined work practices.
85% is the right answer because I said so...