The readers can learn from the Act II of The Crucible about the proctors' marriage through the discrepancy between what john proctor does before he sees his wife and when he talks to her. The reader learns that their marriage is not doing so great.
Act II of The Crucible is a 1996 film starring Joan Allen as Elizabeth, Winona Ryder as Abigail, and also Daniel Day-Lewis as John Proctor.
It is concluded based on the following reasons:
- John continuously lies to Elizabeth.
- Elizabeth does not trust John.
- There is no flow to the conversation.
Here you can learn more about Act II of The Crucible in the link brainly.com/question/1285883
#SPJ4
Answer:
Good small businesses.
Explanation:
It'll support them! They are small, but if their stuff is good, then you shouldn't spend so little.
Answer:
I feel like animal rights would most likely draw someone in, it sure would draw me in!
Explanation:
The correct answer is C. Observing what happened to the Spartans and the Romans shows that it is best to destroy a newly acquired state that is accustomed to freedom.
Explanation:
The text focuses on explaining the differences between the Spartans and the Romans when conquering new territories. The author explains the Romans destroyed and dismantled new territories, and were successful. On the opposite, the Spartans were not successful because they only established a government in new territories.
This implies, destroying new states is a better strategy than allowing freedom, this is reinforced by the idea "he who becomes master of a city accustomed to freedom and does not destroy it may expect to be destroyed by it" that shows the need to destroy or dismantle new states to control them. Thus, the main idea is that destruction is the best strategy to use with acquired states which is proven by comparing Spartans and Romans.
