Need help solving this problem
1 answer:
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
q is TFTF
~q use negation, not q so is the opposite of q : FTFT
p↔~q use biconditional ,and will be True only is both statements are T or both are F
p values are TTFF ↔~q values are FTFT : FTTF
(p↔~q )∧~q use conjunction, that is True only if both statements are T
(p↔~q ) values are FTTF ∧~q values are FTFT : FTFF
(p↔~q )∧~q → p use a conditional statement, where only True False will give a F
(p↔~q )∧~q values are FTFF → p values are TTFF : TTTT
You might be interested in
Answer:
Group A, because seven children have a forearm length longer than 10 inches
Step-by-step explanation:
Create the dot plots based on the given information (please see attached images).
Group A = blue dots
Group B = red dots
From inspection of the attached dot plots, we can see that Group A appears to have the longer average forearm length. This is because 7 children have a forearm length of longer than 10 inches.
To calculate the average forearm length, sum all data values and divide by the total number of data values.
Thus proving that Group A has the longer average former length.
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
<u><em>The complete question is</em></u>
A chef bought $17.01 worth of ribs and chicken. Ribs cost 1.89 per pound and chicken costs 0.90 per pound. The equation 0.90 +1.89r = 17.01 represents the relationship between the quantities in this situation.
Show that each of the following equations is equivalent to 0.9c + 1.89r = 17.01.
Then, explain when it might be helpful to write the equation in these forms.
a. c=18.9-2.1r. b. r= -10÷2c+9
we have that
The linear equation in standard form is
where
c is the pounds of chicken
r is the pounds of ribs
step 1
Solve the equation for c
That means ----> isolate the variable c
Subtract 1.89r both sides
Divide by 0.90 both sides
Simplify
step 2
Solve the equation for r
That means ----> isolate the variable r
Subtract 0.90c both sides
Divide by 1.89 both sides
Simplify
therefore
The equation is equivalent
The equation is helpful, because if I want to know the number of pounds of chicken, I just need to substitute the number of pounds of ribs in the equation to get the result.