Answer:
C) 0 ≤ x ≤ 25
Step-by-step explanation:
We are supposed to find a reasonable constraint so that the function is at least 300 i.e. the value of x at which f(x) is greater or equal to 300
A)x ≥ 0
Refer the graph
At x = 0
f(x)=300
On increasing the value of x , f(x) increases but at x = 12 it starts decreasing
So, x ≥ 0 can also have f(x)<300
So, Option A is wrong
B)−5 ≤ x ≤ 30
At x = -5
f(x) = 100
So, Option B is wrong since we require f(x) is greater or equal to 300
c)0 ≤ x ≤ 25
At x = 0
f(x)=300
At x = 12 , it starts decreasing
At x = 25
f(x)=300
So, The value of f(x) is at least 300 when 0 ≤ x ≤ 25
D)All real numbers
At x = 30
f(x)=0
But we require f(x) greater or equal to 300
Hence Option C is true
Answer:
See below
Step-by-step explanation:
I think we had a question similar to this before. Again, let's figure out the vertical and horizontal distances figured out. The distance from C at x=8 to D at x=-5 is 13 units while the distance from C at y=-2 to D at y=9 is 11 units. (8+5=13 and 2+9=11, even though some numbers are negative, we're looking at their value in those calculations)
Next, we have to divide each distance by 4 so we can apply it to the ratio. 13/4= and 11/4=. Next, we need to read the question carefully. It's asking us to place the point in the ratio <em>3</em> to <em>1</em> from <em>C</em> to <em>D</em>. The point has to be closer to endpoint D because of this. Let's take each of our fractions, multiply them by 3, then add them towards the direction of endpoint D to get our answer (sorry if that sounds confusing):
Therefore, our point that partitions CD into a 3:1 ratio is ().
I'm not sure if there was more to #5 judging by how part B was cut off. From what I can understand of part B, however, I believe that Beatriz started from endpoint D and moved towards C, the wrong direction. She found the coordinates for a 1:3 ratio point.
Also, for #6, since a square is a 2-dimensional object, the answer needs to be written showing that. The answer for #6 is 9 units^2.
<span>Outcome Bag of Gold Magic Wand
Relative frequency 0.32 0.68
</span><span>The relative frequency of getting a bag of gold is .......... reasonably close
</span>
.32 is close to 30% so
<span>Alison's claim about the theoretical probability is likely to be 2............true
Further, this means that the theoretical probability of getting a magic wand is most likely 3............1 - 30% = 70%</span>
Answer:
(-26, 32)
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:
+35 per month
Step-by-step explanation: