Answer:
$95 million
Explanation:
When the Feds buys securities, it is an expansionary monetary policy
Expansionary monetary policy : these are polices taken in order to increase money supply. When money supply increases, aggregate demand increases. reducing interest rate and open market purchase are ways of carrying out expansionary monetary policy
Required reserves is the percentage of deposits required of banks to keep as reserves by the central bank
Required reserves = reserve requirement x deposits
Excess reserves is the extra that it kept by banks
Money supply = deposit / total reserves
total reserves = 30 + 10 = 40%
total increase in money supply = $38 / 0.4 = $95 million
Answer:
very few hierarchical levels
Explanation:
According to my research on different company organizational structures, I can say that based on the information provided within the question Herman Miller is most likely an organization that has very few hierarchical levels. This is since it is mentioned that the employees are placed in teams that are not higher or lower in rank from one another, but at the same time there is still a boss of the company. Therefore there are hierarchical levels but they are extremely few.
I hope this answered your question. If you have any more questions feel free to ask away at Brainly.
Answer:B. if transaction costs are low, private bargaining will result in an efficient solution to the problem of externalities.
Explanation:
The coarse theorem:
If there is a conflict between parties this will lead to an effecient results irrespective of who won the right to the property as long as the transaction cost related to the price negotiation is insignificant.
<span>When Callie developed a detailed description of her ideas for a gym and asked for feedback from women about the proposal, she was engaging in? Concept testing. Concept testing is the act of getting opinions/reactions to a product or service prior to the product or service entering the market. This helps gage consumer interest when pulling in a group of potential customers. </span>
Answer:
d. beta did a better job of explaining the returns than standard deviation
Explanation:
Beta measures the systemic risk associated with the particular investment, it do not compute the total risk associated, which is more logical.
Standard deviation computes the total risk associated.
Some risk is natural, like the risk of floods, natural calamities, earthquake, etc:
That risk shall not counted as for comparison as that is associated universally. Further, the risk associated with particular factors like bankruptcy of a company, or some legal case issue of a company are precisely described by beta coefficient.
Thus, beta provides better details about explaining the returns.
