Answer:
*dummy falls down stairs*
Rachel: AAAAAAHHH!!!!
XD
Answer:
I think it would be metaphor
Explanation:
hope this helps if not please let me know
Answer: let’s say there is old people next door helping them is a good way
Kant's distinction between guardians and minors is based on the propensity of people to dwell in their own immaturity and let others take care of them. Both guardians and minors are victims of this propensity; only, they are placed on the opposite poles. Neither guardians nor minors dare to think for themselves. However, minors almost entirely give up their intellectual potential, indulging in their own laziness of the mind. They rely on different types of guardians. For example, priests are the guardians of their souls; physicians are the guardians of their bodies; politicians are the guardians of their social order, etc. Basically, they are lulled in their comfortable positions of non-thinkers. We have to say, though, that Kant doesn't judge on people for being one or the other. He just proposes that they can rise above those passive positions with the help of enlightenment.
<span>He says he is astonished to have the privilege to address the audience as this places him in a position of surprise and he goes further by expressing his thankfulness not just with words by also by bowing himself before the audience . These two show are humble of a man Frederick Douglas was. He stood for what he preached and that helped his cause of fighting against abolish and slavery in the mid nineteen century</span>