Answer:
Null hypothesis is: U1 - U2 ≤ 0
Alternative hypothesis is U1 - U2 > 0
Step-by-step explanation:
The question involves a comparison of the two types of training given to the salespeople. The requirement is to set up the hypothesis that type A training leads to higher mean weakly sales compared to type B training.
Let U1 = mean sales by type A trainees
Let U2 = mean sales by type B trainees
Therefore, the null hypothesis (H0) is: U1 - U2 ≤ 0
This implies that type A training does not result in higher mean weekly sales than type B training.
The alternative hypothesis (H1) is: U1 - U2 > 0
This implies that type A training indeed results in higher mean weekly sales than type B training.
Answer:
C
Step-by-step explanation:
The fast way: Testing the options!
Teacher loving way:
An= d×n + A0
d= A4-A3=A5-A4=A6-A5...= 6
A3= 0 = 6×3 + A0
A0= -18
Then the equation is: An= 6n - 18
I think it's 5 because i remember learning that it's gonna be half of what the bottom is
Answer:
C
Step-by-step explanation:
I did the math
Substitute x for whatever number is on the graph for x then do the math and get the answer for y and see if they are correct for each one.
Answer:
where is the graph?........
