I believe it’s the Last option. I searched it up for a background check and this is what I found :)
I think it would be A, to appeal to modern day audiences.
Back then women were not as respected and physically capable as men. However women now can do most if not all jobs than men can do. So a hero who doesn’t treat women like they are still incapable may be more appealing than a hero who treats women like children in modern day. (Back then it would have been acceptable or liked)
I can give you some points
-Maybe they grew up with that food
-Maybe their family doesn't like it
-Maybe they have never eaten it or they hated the smell
-Maybe they tried it when they were younger and remember not liking it, or it making them sick
-Maybe they have allergies to a certain food
-Maybe it is just for health reasons
-Maybe they are on a diet and can only eat certain foods
-Maybe they eat that food because it is cheap or it is all that is available.
Hope this helps!! It's not much but I really hope you can do something with this information!!! :)
Answer:
A. As the speaker turns from mourning murder victims to accusing their executioner, the poem focuses on the injustice of the dictator's rule.
Explanation:
<u> A. is the right answer. Around line 30 of the poem the shift occurs, the poet talks about the dictator as the murderer and points finger at him as the unjust ruler and tyrant</u>. The author is explaining how it is the dictator’s fault that millions are dead and how he also has “the heart and the skull”, and so does the audience that claps and supports him, but which can become the victim as well.
B. is not the right answer. The poem does not explore the experiences of survivors' feelings of guilt.
C. is not the right answer. The poem does not call people to action against the dictator.
D. is not the right answer. There is no part about securing closure for certain, and the poem ends ambiguously.
