The main difference is that the article suggests the murder was likely committed by robbers, while the excerpt suggests a widerrange of suspects.
<h3>How can this difference be noticed?</h3>
Through the reading of texts.
By identifying the characterization of the killer.
By comparing the diction between the texts.
Through the purpose of each text.
With the reading of both texts, it is possible to see that the article tends to present the murder in a more objective and specific way, while the excerpt wants to show that the murder was more complex and with layers of difficult determination.
because he acts a certain way or says certain thing to give of the apperince or the feel of being indea and pirzada is suprised to find out he is not indian
You must walk in the halls, not run, you can get seriously hurt. You can trip and scar up your knees, you can tumble and fall, and hit your behind. hope this helps :)
