Hey there,
Your answer would be in the attachment above.
Hope this helps.
~Jurgen(Any questions?, Just comment below) =)
Answer:
6(y+1) Hope this helps!!
Step-by-step explanation:
<h3>
Answer: Choice B</h3>
Use a rigid transformation to prove that angle NPO is congruent to angle NLM
=====================================================
Explanation:
The AA stands for "angle angle". So we need two pairs of angles to prove the triangles to be similar. The first pair of angles is the vertical angles ONP and MNL, which are congruent. Any pair of vertical angles are always congruent.
The second pair of angles could either be
- angle NOP = angle NML
- angle NPO = angle NLM
so we have a choice on which to pick. The pairing angle NOP = angle NML is not listed in the answer choices, but angle NPO = angle NLM is listed as choice B.
Saying angle NLM = angle LMN is not useful because those two angles are part of the same triangle. The two angles must be in separate triangles to be able to tie the triangles together.
We would use a rigid transformation to have angle NPO move to angle NLM, or vice versa through the use of a rotation and a translation.
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
Product of a number and its multiplicative inverse should be equal to 1.
So,
Answer:
35 grams
Step-by-step explanation:
The ratio of zinc to copper is 3 to 11
A jar of chemical contains 385 grams if copper
Therefore the number of grams of zinc it contains can be calculated as follows
3/11= x/385
11x= 385
x= 385/11
= 35 grams
Hence the chemical contains 35 grams of zinc
