Answer: Choice B
There is not convincing evidence because the interval contains 0.
========================================================
Explanation:
The confidence interval is (-0.29, 0.09)
This is the same as writing -0.29 < p1-p1 < 0.09
The thing we're trying to estimate (p1-p2) is between -0.29 and 0.09
Because 0 is in this interval, it is possible that p1-p1 = 0 which leads to p1 = p2.
Therefore, it is possible that the population proportions are the same.
The question asks " is there convincing evidence of a difference in the true proportions", so the answer to this is "no, there isn't convincing evidence". We would need both endpoints of the confidence interval to either be positive together, or be negative together, for us to have convincing evidence that the population proportions are different.
This is an improper. Perhaps you can fix it, so that I can assist you with it? I apologise.
Answer:
A
Step-by-step explanation:
You can multiply both sides on an equation by the reciprocal to cancel the fraction on the first side.
Answer:
D
Step-by-step explanation:
You can see from the table that joules out = 4x moles in
for 32 moles 32 * 4 = 128 joules
Answer:
x should equal 16
Step-by-step explanation: