Answer: c. presumed conclusions based on the recurrence of specific instances
Explanation:
In the traditional logic, the representatives of traditional inductivism, saw the task of inductive logic in the analysis of the processes with which the general theoretical knowledge is obtained starting from the particular, the specific experiences.
Hence, one of the central concepts of contemporary inductive logic is that something has happened so much in different experiences, which is usually interpreted as the probability of the hypothesis taking into account the particular knowledge obtained. With this, contemporary inductive logic uses the methods of probability calculation
c is your correct answer because Metafiction is a narrative technique in which the work self-consciously calls attention to itself as a work of fiction.
The noun clause in the given sentence is an indirect object.
Explanation:
A noun clause is a dependent clause that acts as a noun and can fulfill the function of a subject, direct and indirect object, object of a preposition, or predicate nominative. Noun clauses begin with words such as <em>how, that, what, whatever, when, where, whether, which, whichever, who, whoever, whom, whomever, </em>and <em>why. </em>In the given sentence, a noun clause is <em>whomever wins the Spirit Award.</em>
An indirect object usually refers to someone or something that is affected by the action of a transitive verb, most commonly as a recipient. <em>Whomever wins the Spirit Award </em>is an indirect object of the sentence and represents the recipient (someone who will receive a scholarship).
The subject of the sentence is <em>the league. </em>As there is no preposition in the sentence, the given noun phrase can't be an object of a preposition. The predicate nominative is a noun that follows a linking verb and renames or describes the subject. Nothing like that is encountered in the sentence either. So, the correct option is<em> indirect object.</em>
Learn more about noun clauses here: brainly.com/question/2416201
#LearnWithBrainly
<span>it's D: All astronauts had master’s or doctorate degrees, but only two were jet pilots; consequently, the astronauts with no flight experience had to complete one year of flight training.
</span>
I think the correct answer from the choices listed above is option B. It would be proofreading sentences for punctuation that is <span>not a step in writing a draft of an autobiography. It should be in the last steps in writing. Hope this answers the question.</span>