Answer:
Well bias means like making somthing sound maybe better or worse in your favor. For example a soccer team looses and you put it like the other soccer team cheated, that would be bias.
Hi, you've asked an incomplete/unclear question. The full question read;
Which of the phrases below is <u>not</u> in the future perfect continuous?
a) You will have been waiting here for three hours by 8 o'clock.
b) You will be waiting for her when her plane arrives tonight.
c) By the end of next month I will have been living here for ten years.
d) When I finish this course, I will have been learning Italian for ten years.
e) Next month I will have been working here for two years.
Answer:
<u>b) You will be waiting for her when her plane arrives tonight.</u>
Explanation:
We make this conclusion because the phrase <em>"will have been" </em> (which is the future perfect of the verb "to be") is often added to the subject of a sentence to make it future perfect continuous.
However, after careful check of all the sentences, we notice all of them except option b used the future perfect continuous phrase, <em>"will have been." </em>
Answer:
An arpeggio is:
B. playing a series of chords in a particular order
Explanation:
All right here we go. This is a very difficult question because is not very clear. However, we need to remember what an arpeggio is. An arpeggio is a small scale of different notes arranged in a degrading or increasing pattern of order. So, the answer that guards more similarity with the concept is: b) because c and d say it is discontinuous, which is not the nature of the arpeggio. So we have only a and b. But a is not the case because it says simultaneously. When arpeggio has order.
The words <em>could have been baking </em>are considered to be A) compound verb since it consists of more than one word.
