<span>This would show that Will does not have a homothetic preference for hamburgers. Such preferences are shown to not be effected by income or scale, and since Will has changed his eating preferences based upon this new source of income, such a description would not fit this good.</span>
Answer:
a. Show her the list and then take it away and have her testify from her 'refreshed recollection.'
Explanation:
In the given scenario Gloria testifies that when she came to work the day after the robbery, she noticed that large amounts of inventory were missing. She spent the entire day cataloguing the missing items.
In the trial she said she can remember what was stolen.
Under rule 612 the prosecutor is allowed to.show her the list and them take it away. Gloria can now testify from her refreshed memory.
On the other hand if she said she could recall the items the prosecutor would have under the hearsay exception (rule 803 (5)) requested she state the missing items.
But in this case she said she cannot recall the items
Answer:
retaliation.
Explanation:
Title VII of hte Civil rights Act of 1964 prohibits discrimination at work based on race, color, ethnic origin, gender, religion, etc. What the company was doing was wrong, and the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) should deal with this issue. But what they did to Hailey for complaining about the company's wrong deeds is twice as bad. The company not only keeps discriminating African American employees but also retaliates against Hailey for demanding something that is correct and legal.
Answer:
D. Bonds pay dividends
Explanation:
Just finished the test :)
