As we read the conversation between Mr. Hooper and Elizabeth, we can see that Hooper is determined to continue to wear the black veil, no matter what it may cause.
We can arrive at this answer as follows:
- Elizabeth and Hooper are engaged.
- Their conversation started because Elizabeth demands to know why Hooper is wearing a black veil all the time.
- The black veil makes Hooper look somber and Elizabeth believes that, as his fiancée, she has a right to know why he is acting this way.
- However, Hooper is unwilling to either tell her why he is wearing the veil or stop wearing it.
- He believes Elizabeth should trust him as his bride.
The conversation between them shakes the engagement between the two, but Hooper shows that he will continue wearing the veil even if it saddens his fiancée and even if the engagement needs to be ended.
This question is related to "The Minister's Black Veil" by Nathaniel Hawthorne. In this story, we meet a Puritan town that is terrified of the town's minister's decision to wear a mysterious black veil.
More information:
brainly.com/question/4418823?referrer=searchResults
Here the answer
Every sitcom episode has a main plot (story A), as well as one or two subplots (stories B and C).” There are three main acts, divided by two commercial breaks (in most American TV), with 3-5 scenes per act.
<span>I believe the correct answer is a plea for better education for women.</span>
Mary Wollstonecraft’s “The Vindication of the
Rights of Woman” had for the main purpose to convince the readers to accept her
point of view – that women’s weakness was artificial and the education should
be the same for both men and women. She believed that women’s minds were “flowers
planted in soil that is too rich” and that they had no weaknesses compared to
men, so this essay might be subtitled as a plea for the better education for
women.
Considering the first line of the poem <em>"I Hear America Singing"</em>: I hear America singing, the varied carols I hear, and also taking in consideration the <em>entire poem's context</em>, it can be understood that the <em>speaker's view of the American identity is one of an identity composed by many voices singing many different songs</em>. That, of course, as a <em>metaphor</em> for <em>different people living different realities that contribute to forming a nation's identity</em>. The speaker <em>lists</em>, in the poem, various professions and activities being held by these people:
<em>"The carpenter singing his as he measures his plank or beam, </em>
<em>The mason singing his as he makes ready for work (...)</em>
<em>The boatman singing what belongs to him in his boat (...)"</em>
And so he continues. <em>"Each singing what belongs to him or her and to none else"</em>, he says, conveying that this<em> identity would be composed by many different realities, points of view, and stories</em>, because every single one of these people <em>can only "sing" or express from their points of view</em>. Thus, the <em>American nation's identity is a mixture of various realities</em>, being each one of them important to be heard. Together, they create a whole based on variety.
