Answer:
From the information given about the contract and its execution between the two parties involved( That is, Parc and Glaze), the option 2 is most likely.
2. Glaze will win because Glaze substantially performed and Parc prevented complete performance.
Explanation:
It is stated that Glaze was hired to remodel and furnish an office suite, after a submitted plans by Glaze were approved by Parc. It was further stated that the construction and painting had been done.
Although, with Glaze purchasing minor accessories which Parc rejected because they did not conform to the plans is a breach of contract, but that can be corrected by calling Glaze to order. However, it was Parc that refused to allow Glaze to make necessary corretion and complete the project and also refused to pay Glaze any part of the contract price.
Answer:
A) we requiere to fulfill the Vitamint contrains or surpass them A => 12 C=>6
B) we request that instead of fullfilling the vitaming requirement to be 12/6 or more
to be exactly for this amount.
Explanation:
We set up the situation in excel Solver with the following constraing:
1 2 3 4
A 3 3 1 7
B 3 1 1 1
C 12 6 24
C2 = A1*A2 + B1*B2
C3 = A1*A3 + B1*B3
C4 = A1*A4 + B1*B4
common constraing:
C4 min
A1 = integer
B1 = integer
A) constraing
C2 => 12
C3 =>6
B) contraing to achieve the exact value for each vitamin:
C2 = 12
C3 = 6
Answer: Sarah failed to evaluate a potential ethical issue.
Explanation:
From the question, we are informed that Sarah who is the controller of a large beverage supplier, supervises two employees and that her boss, Vladimir, told her to increase the company's inventory balance for an amount that is material to the financial statements by crediting several small "miscellaneous" expense accounts.
We are further told that Sarah does not know the reason behind this but told one of her staff to make them because she has been instructed to do so.
We can see that Sarah failed to evaluate a potential ethical issue. She didn't evaluate the effect of what she is doing. In this case, what her boss told her to do could be a case of fraud and she just obliged without asking questions which will put her conscience at ease in case anything happens but the fact that she just did it without asking questions or thinking if what she has done is morally right or wrong, it shows that Sarah failed to evaluate a potential ethical issue.
Answer:
Explanation:
A product item is a specific version of a product that can be designated as a distinct offering among an organization's products. A product line is a group of closely related products offered by an organization.
