Answer: It supported the District Court’s decision that the students’ constitutional rights had not been violated.
Explanation:
The case of Ingraham v. Wright was heard in 1976 in the Supreme court based on an event that happened in 1970 where James Ingraham was paddled by the principal of a public high school in Florida to the point of needing medical assistance.
The district court the case was first heard in dismissed it and the Court of Appeals upheld this dismissal.
The Supreme court then agreed with the District court in saying that corporal punishment did not infringe upon Constitutional rights so the students’ constitutional rights had not been violated.
Yes, because his mother taught him to look at the world not only from his own perspective, but also from other one. This will lead him to not judge a book by its cover and keep an open mind to others’ situations in the future.
Wizard, if you're talking about computer software
Hello. You did not inform the book to which the question refers, but according to the context it presents, we can see that it is the book "The Diary of Anne Frank."
Answer and Explanation:
The arrival of Mr. Dussel changes the installation of the other members of the secret annex in the available rooms. Space becomes more limited and the division of food and tasks becomes more complicated. Furthermore, Mr. Dussel is not used to living with so many people, nor is he used to having to deal with someone as young and as opinionated as Anne. Because of this, living with him becomes a challenge, since he is ungrateful, stressed and controlling, as he represses Anne as much as he can.
"The Diary of Anne Frank" presents the account of a Jewish girl, Anne, about the moments when she was hidden from Nazi violence, in addition to hiding so as not to be taken to concentration camps. Anne went into hiding with her family and other Jews, including Mr. Dussel, who joined the hiding place much later and presented problems of establishment, especially in relation to Anne.
May you provide more details?