Usually, in a conclusion, you wrap up what you have been writing about the whole time. So, a conclusion is basically a summary of the whole text. You can introduce new ideas for the reader, but it is usually inadvisable. In a couple of sentences, you should finish your text, referring to the previous paragraphs and just wrap it all up nicely.
Answer:
D. The deer was not able to pick up the scent of the author.
Explanation:
The whole sentence reads
"The wind must have been right, because he kept on browsing the mossy ground." The deer kept on browsing the mossy ground because it did not pick up the scent of the man. Otherwise, it would have run away.
Answer:
The correct answer is 1. incomplete comparison.
Explanation:
In the example, there can certainly exist a logical relation between the two propositions (inquisitive students - make - better students), however, since there is not enough information, a logical relation between them cannot be properly constructed. If the comparison presented some sort of argument then it would be complete. For instance: "Inquisitive children, <em>since they are more curious and open to learning</em>, make better students". Without the argument, the idea seems more like an unsustained opinion, based on prejudice, than anything else.
Answer:
When men were fighting, women got to take on their "at home" roles or fight with the men. In what ways do the military practices described by Marco Polo reflect the influence of the Steppe environment on the Mongols? They could get better due to the ability to practice on the main land
Explanation:
hope this helps
Many times in life we do things logical, such as what's right and what's wrong.
