Answer:
While reading Gerald Graff’s essay, “Hidden Intellectualism”, Graff claims that there are many people in which knows of someone who tends to be vernacular to the point where they are considered to be “street smart”. Graff exposes in his essay that intellect goes beyond the academia and scholarly form of thinking, that knowledge can also take the form within what Graff considers “street smarts”. Graff then goes on to argue that schools should take these “street smarts” and “channel them into good academic work”.
Answer:
He tells us when he has minor flaws such as being afraid.
Explanation:
One of the most common issues making a narrator untrustworthy is his/her bias toward oneself and toward other characters of the story whom he/she likes or does not like.
Most of the time bias is in favor of oneself, in rare cases it may be against oneself - blaming oneself excessively.
Telling one's own minor and/or major flaws is only one of many characteristics to make a narrator trustworthy.
All other options are either insignificant for adjudging him as a trustworthy narrator, or opposite of what makes him trustworthy and neutral.
Second and third options are insignificant (do not contribute in making him neutral narrator)
Fourth option is incorrect because focusing on oneself makes a narrator biased and hence untrustworthy.
Answer:
D. Informal language
Explanation:
Presenting yourself in a lax, easy way, such as being informal, suggests to the audience that this is not a formal setting and that it's okay to be at ease, creating a friendlier space between your and your audience.
The correct answer is definitely the historical method.
You should observe words and their usage as it developed throughout history.
Answer:
Read It
Work on your own to identify examples of Amar's use of historical details,
numerical data, and quotations. Explain how each example helps to tell the
story of the Constitution and build Amar's argument
