Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
a. H0: μ ≤ 104 Ha: μ > 104
Assuming the data leads to the rejection of the null hypothesis, we would conclude that there is no sufficient statistical evidence to prove that the cost of electricity for an efficient home in a particular neighborhood of Cincinnati, Ohio, was $104 per month.
b. The type error in this situation would be rejecting the null hypothesis when it is actually true. Rejecting the fact that the cost of electricity for an efficient home in a particular neighborhood of Cincinnati, Ohio, was $104 per month when it was actually true.
c. Type II error in this case would be failing to reject the null when it is false. Failing to reject the fact that the cost of electricity for an efficient home in a particular neighborhood of Cincinnati, Ohio, was $104 per month when it is actually not true.
The consequences for these errors might be disastrous including sueing of the accuser party etc.
Answer:
-3/22
Step-by-step explanation:
Mulitiply straight across. Num * num/ denom * denom.
Now you have -6/44. Divide both by 2 to simplify into simipliest form.
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
Put n = 2 and next n = 3 to the recursive formula:
5/8=0.625
7/12=0.583......
5/8 is bigger as ive put both into a decimal as it is easier to tell
Answer:
x >-8
Step-by-step explanation:
22−2x<38
Subtract 22 from each side
22-22−2x<38-22
-2x < 16
Divide each side by -2, remembering to flip the inequality
-2x/-2 > 16/-2
x >-8
