Answer:
Explanation:
In my opinion, I would like to say that Clean Machines Company is correct. If you look at it this way, you'd see that there actually isn't any contract between Clean Machines Company and Dealer. When it came to about offers, the person offering is able to revoke an offer before the offer is even accepted. And he won't be held responsible unless of course, the offer is irrevocable. Then, to make the offer to be irrevocable, the Dealer then would have needed to prove that an option was present, or prove that the offer is was not able to be revoked due to UCC provision.
Answer:
B. A violation of establishment of responsibility
Explanation:
They both should have established something different to work on but for both of them to work the same cash register, it is a violation of establishment of responsibility
Answer:
$3,418,800
Explanation:
Contribution margin per hour:
Plush: 4 units per hour x $231 = $924
Supreme: 2 units per hour x $317 = $634
Since contribution margin per hour from Plush is higher than Supreme, we select Plush as the most profitable sales. Hence,
Total contribution = 3,700 hours available x $924 = $3,418,800
Hope this helps!
Answer:
<u>Since expected payoff for large job shop option is highest, firm should make large job shop option as capacity choice</u>
Explanation:
Expected payoff of any capacity alternative
= Probability of moderate acceptance x Payoff of moderate acceptance + Probability of strong acceptance x Payoff of strong acceptance
= 0.40 x Payoff of moderate acceptance + 0.60 x Pay off of strong acceptance
Thus Pay off for small job shop option
= 0.40 x 24000 + 0.6 x 54000
= 9600 + 32400
= $42,000
Pay off for medium job shop option
= 0.40 x 20000 + 0.60 x 64000
= 8000 + 38400
= $ 46,400
Pay off for large job shop option
= - 0.40 x 2000 + 0.60 x 96000
= - 800 + 57600
= $56,800
