Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
Use the distributive property to get rid of the brackets.
9i + 2*7 + 2*3i Use the multiplication property to simplify the imaginary terms
9i + 2*3i + 2*7 Do the same to the real term
9i + 6i + 14 Use the addition of like terms property
15i + 14 And that's your answer.
You may not like my terminology, but you have to remember that every text teaches this differently.
Answer:
A minimum of 24 students if all the students share a class with you. Not enough info to decide the largest size of grade.
Step-by-step explanation:
Its an indirect proof, so 3 steps :-
1) you start with the opposite of wat u need to prove
2) arrive at a contradiction
3) concludeReport · 29/6/2015261
since you wanto prove 'diagonals of a parallelogram bisect each other', you start wid the opposite of above statement, like below :- step1 : Since we want to prove 'diagonals of a parallelogram bisect each other', lets start by assuming the opposite, that the diagonals of parallelogram dont bisect each other.Report · 29/6/2015261
Since, we assumed that the diagonals dont bisect each other,
OC≠OA
OD≠OBReport · 29/6/2015261
Since, OC≠OA, △OAD is not congruent to △OCBReport · 29/6/2015261
∠AOD≅∠BOC as they are vertical angles,
∠OAD≅∠OCB they are alternate interior angles
AD≅BC, by definition of parallelogram
so, by AAS, △OAD is congruent to △OCBReport · 29/6/2015261
But, thats a contradiction as we have previously established that those triangles are congruentReport · 29/6/2015261
step3 :
since we arrived at a contradiction, our assumption is wrong. so, the opposite of our assumption must be correct. so diagonals of parallelogram bisect each other.
answer: you're missing the problem
Answer:
The $2,000 decrease in Carlos's taxable income will save him
Step-by-step explanation:
i) Carlos is in the 12% tax bracket.
ii)The $2,000 decrease in Carlos's taxable income will save him