The answer:
The The character of Beatrice in Much ado about nothing is accused of
* Disdain and scorn- here are some examples of situations where this is mentioned in the story. First, we have the moment when Benedict arrives to Leonato's house and see Beatrice when he expresses this - What, my dear Lady Disdain! are you yet living?-
Another example could be during the conversation between Hero and Ursula in the garden when Hero says - But Nature never framed a woman's heart of prouder stuff than that of Beatrice; disdain and scorn ride sparkling in her eyes.
* Inability to love, this accusation happens during the conversation between Hero an Ursula too, when Hero says - All matter else seems weak: she cannot love, Nor take no shape nor project of affection-. A second example is the expression of Claudio during his conversation with Leonato where he says - I did never think that lady would have loved any man- referring to Beatrice.
Correct answer- improper etiquette. Beatrice being a lady that grew up surrounded by lords has a high-level etiquette, the family of Leonato her Uncle welcome the soldiers with all the proper elegance and respect that high society people are used to having. So that she's never accused of that fault.
Answer: adding details to describe Raul’s behavior
Explanation:
The text mentions that Cara tried to remain calm in order to be able to see things from Raul's point of view yet Raul's behavior made that hard to do.
Carla should add details describing Raul's behavior so that the readers can know exactly what it was that Raul was doing that made it so hard for Carla to remain calm. This would paint a clearer picture of the situation to readers.
The questionable cause fallacy may be considered to have been used in this paragraph, because the causal relationships of the argument were based on a correlation that is not sufficient to prove an argument.
For example, when the author uses the terms:
It is possible to see that there is an informal fallacy of questionable cause, as an event correlated to another may not actually be the cause established by the author.
Therefore, to avoid informal fallacies in a text, it is necessary to have sufficient evidence and grounding to support your argument, through premises that lead to true and proven conclusions.
Learn more here:
brainly.com/question/18428404
Explanation:
A witness would be someone that has experienced something at first hand, having saw something from a different perspective. An ally is someone who is acquainted with you, or someone you could trust. A witness cannot be an ally if you are against their side in some form or way. A witness can be an ally if it is your best friend or someone you trust to prove you innocent.
Basically, a witness is a neutral term that describes someone that saw something. While an ally refers to mutually acceptable.
