The relative unfairness of an apportionment that gives a new board member to joshua rather than to salinas will be
<h3>How to calculate the values?</h3>
The relative unfairness of an apportionment that gives a new board member to joshua rather than to salinas will be:
= (1520 - 1232)/1232
= 288/1232
= 0.234
The relative unfairness of an apportionment that gives a new board member to salinas rather than to Joshua will be:
= (1448 - 1333)/1333
= 115/1333
= 0.086
The regional governing board that should receive the new board member is Salinas.
Learn more about tables on:
brainly.com/question/3632175
#SPJ1
Negative
Positive
Positive
Negative
Answer:
a. $45.86
b. $43.87
c. Percentage change = -4.40%)
Step-by-step explanation:
a. Let the price of share at the beginning of first year be represented with X
Now, Price of company's share dropped by 3.50% at the end of first year.
So, Price of share at the end of first year = x - 3.5% of x
= x - 0.035x
= 1x - 0.035x
= 0.965x
But it is equal to $44.25
=> 0.965x = 44.25
x = 44.25 / 0.965
x = 45.8549223
x = $45.86
b. During second year price of share decreased by $1.99. Therefore, Price of share at the end of second year = $45.86 - $1.99 = $43.87
c. Percentage change in the price of shares over two years = {(45.86 - 43.87)/45.86} *100
= (1.99/45.86)*100
= 0.04339294 * 100
= 4.40%
Now, as price of shares has dropped, the percentage change will be negative. (Δ% = -4.40%)
Solution:
f(x) = 2x + 3
g(x) = x - 9
f(x) + g(x)
= (2x + 3) + (x - 9)
= 2x + x + 3 - 9
= 3x - 6
