Answer: A reasonable estimate of the minimum is 20.
Answer:
square root of 10
Step-by-step explanation:
since triangle CAT with vertex A at negative 2 comma 1, vertex T at negative 1 comma 4 and vertex C at 0 comma 0, side AT has a measure of square root of 10 units, side TC has a measure of square root of 17 units, and side AC has a measure of square root of 5 units, therefore the square root will be 10
<u>Please</u><u> </u><u>put</u><u> </u><u>a</u><u> </u><u>picture</u><u> </u><u>next</u><u> </u><u>time</u><u> </u><u>:</u><u>)</u>
Answer:
REMEMBER:
to find the sine, cosine on the unit circle:
cos a = coordinate value x
sin a = coordinate value of y
Step-by-step explanation:
I'm not sure y'all but i hopes this helps just a remember.
Answer:
The proof contains a simple direct proof, wrapped inside the unnecessary logical packaging of a proof by contradiction framework.
Step-by-step explanation:
The proof is rigourous and well written, so we discard the second answer.
This is not a fake proof by contradiction: it does not have any logical fallacies (circular arguments) or additional assumptions, like, for example, the "proof" of "All the horses are the same color". It is factually correct, but it can be rewritten as a direct proof.
A meaningful proof by contradiction depends strongly on the assumption that the statement to prove is false. In this argument, we only this assumption once, thus it is innecessary. Other proofs by contradiction, like the proof of "The square root of 2 is irrational" or Euclid's proof of the infinitude of primes, develop a longer argument based on the new assumption, but this proof doesn't.
To rewrite this without the superfluous framework, erase the parts "Suppose that the statement is false" and "The fact that the statement is true contradicts the assumption that the statement is false. Thus, the assumption that the statement was false must have been false. Thus, the statement is true."