Below are the <span> two reasons why the data might not support the hypothesis:
</span><span>
1) The hypothesis was wrong
2) The data is wrong
A hypothesis is a proposed thought that may clarify a perception or marvels. It is confirmed by testing it. In the event that the information bolsters the theory, at that point, we view the speculation as checked and genuine. Assuming, be that as it may, the information does not bolster the speculation or discredits it, at that point the theory is in a bad position, and we need to concoct an alternate speculation to clarify the perceptions.
</span>
Answer:
A
Explanation:
The investment A was more risky, but in general they were both pretty much a risk.
With both having a produced annual rates of return in under 10%
Reason for A being the riskier is that his annual rate of return in average was 8%, while B's annual rate was 9%
Difference may seem small, but for bigger investments 1% can be a deal breaker.
Answer:
Option "A" is the correct answer to the following statement.
Explanation:
In the modern era, everyone relates himself with surveys reports easily, If a speaker uses survey reports during his lectures every individual attracts numerical provided data. this will create a suitable environment for the speaker.
In an immediate environment, the speaker tries to attract individuals by providing them survey reports which authorized his opinion.
Answer:
the same quantity of output as a perfectly competitive market. If anything is wrong let me know since I'm new to answering questions
Explanation:
Answer:
Free-market
Explanation:
As Alana can import without paying quotas to the government the economy i nthis country is of free-market. The government doesn't try to restrict their citizens from the goods and services offered fro manother countries.
Same is true for the sale of national product to abroa,there is no qupta, tariff or additional cost involved in trade thant those generated from the transactions. It is tax-free to import and export