Competitive price taker firms always earn zero economic profit in long-run equilibrium because of the following reasons which include easy entry & exit, small player etc.
Perfect competition exists when there are many sellers, firms can easily enter and exit, products are identical from one seller to the next, and sellers are price takers.
A perfectly competitive firm must accept the equilibrium price at which it sells goods because it is a price taker.
A perfectly competitive firm will be unable to make any sales if it charges even a small amount more than the market price.
Furthermore, a perfectly competitive firm must be a very small player in the overall market, allowing it to increase or decrease output without affecting the overall quantity supplied and price in the market.
Hence, Competitive price taker firms always earn zero economic profit in long-run equilibrium.
Learn more about Long-run equilibrium:
brainly.com/question/6275304
#SPJ4
Whenever there is maximization of total surplus that is been received by those that are part of society by market allocation of resources then there is market Efficiency.
- Economic efficiency can be regarded as economic state whereby there is allocation of resource to serve each individual or entity in way that everyone is satisfied while minimizing waste and inefficiency.
Therefore, When there is an economy efficiency, there would be maximization of total surplus.
Learn more at:brainly.com/question/15520856?referrer=searchResults
The statement, "Common stock is a vehicle for selling ownership and another way to raise money for operations, expansion, or other business needs" is true.
<u>Explanation:</u>
Common stock is a distribution tool and a way to raise capital for investment, business growth or other company needs.
Common stock is a kind of company holding, a type of safety. In many other regions of the world, the terms polling share and prevalent share are frequently were using.
The "common stock" is used mainly in the USA. These are classified as shareholdings or common shares in the United Kingdom and other Commonwealth.
It means that one common stock share constitutes percentage equity of a corporation. In certain words, this is a way to split the assets of a corporation.
For example, if 100 shares were taken out, one share would amount to one percent of the company's intellectual property.
Considering the situation described above, it is concluded that Korea is a <u>High context</u> culture, and the U.S. is a <u>low-context</u> culture.
A high context culture is a type of culture that is characterized by collectivism and an implicit form of communication.
On the other hand, a low context culture is a type of culture that is associated with direct verbal interaction and individualism.
It is no secret that the United States promotes individualism or independence as a society which is a form of low context culture. In contrast, the Korean culture promotes stability and group relation, which is a form of high context culture.
Hence, in this case, it is concluded that Korea has high context culture while the United States has a low-context culture.
Learn more here: brainly.com/question/17438233
Answer:
gadget companies trhssfgfkgxjgxkgd