The correct answer to this open question is the following.
Although there are no options attached, we can comment on the following,
The dimensions of the company that are being used to arrive at that conclusion are the dimension of Marketing and the dimension of Strategy. The other two dimensions, Operations and Finances, are important two but are not really considered in the statement.
So it is positive that the Meduri fruit company is using a form of evaluation to find its place in the market and discover new opportunities that are being missed by some "corporative blindness." The brand asset valuator tool from Young & Rubicam is a recommended tool to find new things about your brand and see future possibilities, opportunities, and challenges. After finding its results, Meduri has to develop a marketing and brand strategy to fulfill those potentials and to reposition the brand in the mind of consumers.
Answer:
The argument that the higher courts had decided the cases of similar facts and circumstance in such a way that he can expect that the court rules in his company's favor is a valid argument. The argument is based on the doctrine of stare decisions. The meaning of the doctrine stare decisions is to stand on decided cases. It is a common practice to decide the case based on the former decisions of the judicial systems. It is a set principle that if the court of higher rank has set a precedent then lower court must adhere to it. Therefore, this argument is a valid argument.
The courts are bound to follow the rule set by its higher authority. However, it is not always necessary to obligate its precedents and sometimes, the court can depart from this rule. This could be done only in the circumstances where it is found that the precedent is simply incorrect or due to social changes or technological changes made the precedent inapplicable. Therefore, the court in this case can not necessarily be ruled as the other courts had done.
Answer:
c. $480,930
Explanation:
In this method we applied the unitary method
Given that
Sales volume = 40,000 units
Sales = $492,000
Sales volume = 39,100 units
Sales = ?
So, by considering the given information, the sales for 39,100 units would be
= Sales × updated sales units ÷ last sales units
= $492,000 × 39,100 units ÷ 40,000 units
= $480,930
Answer:
b. $10,000
Explanation:
Estimated selling price - Estimated cost of disposal = Net realisable value ceiling.
NRV Ceiling = $208,000 - $10,000 = $198,000
Net realisable value Floor = Ceiling - normal profit margin
NRV Floor = $198,000 - $6,000 = $192,000
Market value Current replacement cost = $190,000
Market Loss = NRV ceiling - RC
Market loss = $200,000 - $190,000 = $10,000
