B) It is unnecessary to oversee the athletes involved in mixed martial arts.
The viewpoint made in section one is that "State athletic commissions should strictly monitor and regulate the UFC." A rebuttal statement is one that goes against the viewpoint, so it needs to say something about how the UFC should not be monitored or regulated. Option A agrees with the viewpoint by saying overseeing athletes is necessary. Option B states the opposite by saying it is unnecessary to oversee athletes. Therefore, this is the correct answer. Option C says that athletes must self-regulate. While this puts the responsibility of regulating on the athletes, it does not take it away from the commissions. There is nothing here to suggest that the commissions would not regulate just because the athletes are. Option D has nothing to do with monitoring or regulating so it is a poor choice.
Old Man old man with brown skin talking of past when being shephard in utah, nevada, colorado and new mexico was life lived freely; old man, grandfather, wise with time running rivulets on face, deep, rich furrows, each one a legacy, deep, rich memories of life . . . "you are...
I have not read the whole story, so I am not sure. But heres a helper: Exposition=intro Rising action=what happens after what starts the story Climax=when the conflict hits a turning point Falling action= the conflict being solved And the end= the conflict is finally solved