The question is somewhat poorly posed because the equation doesn't involve <em>θ</em> at all. I assume the author meant to use <em>x</em>.
sec(<em>x</em>) = csc(<em>x</em>)
By definition of secant and cosecant,
1/cos(<em>x</em>) = 1/sin(<em>x</em>)
Multiply both sides by sin(<em>x</em>) :
sin(<em>x</em>)/cos(<em>x</em>) = sin(<em>x</em>)/sin(<em>x</em>)
As long as sin(<em>x</em>) ≠ 0, this reduces to
sin(<em>x</em>)/cos(<em>x</em>) = 1
By definition of tangent,
tan(<em>x</em>) = 1
Solve for <em>x</em> :
<em>x</em> = arctan(1) + <em>nπ</em>
<em>x</em> = <em>π</em>/4 + <em>nπ</em>
(where <em>n</em> is any integer)
In the interval 0 ≤ <em>x</em> ≤ 2<em>π</em>, you get 2 solutions when <em>n</em> = 0 and <em>n</em> = 1 of
<em>x</em> = <em>π</em>/4 <u>or</u> <em>x</em> = 5<em>π</em>/4
Hello!
To factor you find the biggest number they can be divided by
The biggest number that all the number can be divided by is 10
You put that outside parenthesis
10()
Divide the expression by 10
3 + x - 4y
Put the two together
10(3 + x + 4y)
Hope this helps!
Answer:
There is not sufficient evidence to support the claim μ > 54.4.
Step-by-step explanation:
1) Previous concepts
A hypothesis is defined as "a speculation or theory based on insufficient evidence that lends itself to further testing and experimentation. With further testing, a hypothesis can usually be proven true or false".
The null hypothesis is defined as "a hypothesis that says there is no statistical significance between the two variables in the hypothesis. It is the hypothesis that the researcher is trying to disprove".
The alternative hypothesis is "just the inverse, or opposite, of the null hypothesis. It is the hypothesis that researcher is trying to prove".
2) Solution to the problem
On this case we want to test is and the system of hypothesi on this case are:
Null Hypothesis:
Alternative hypothesis:
On this case is our decision is FAILS to reject the null hypothesis then we can conclude that we don't have enough evidence to support the claim at the significance level provided. So the correct conclusion would be:
There is not sufficient evidence to support the claim μ > 54.4.